Thread:Jackboog21/@comment-26699584-20181226062455/@comment-24045334-20190103025227

Kittygirl7878 wrote: Bunnylove14 wrote: Some more thoughts after reading over this: I agree that admins have no check. I think a large part on why it's been so difficult to give the community a say is the aforementioned immature users. I think if we really wanted to give the community a bigger say we would need to crack down more on immature users. I've felt for a long time that we are just too lenient on these users and I feel we need to be stricter, but I don't really know how to set a line/rule because immaturity is in some ways subjective. I think a stripped down version of this may work (I still don't think we need whole new positions, promotions would be better) but there is a lot of work to be done. We really need a platform where ALL ACTIVE STAFF can talk. Say, would it make us look too authoritative if we were to judge others based on maturity? A fine idea in theory, but like you said, maturity is subjective. Furthermore, many of the users here are under the age of sixteen, so observing maturity would be a tricky task considering the bulk of this wiki's user-base. Exactly what I was thinking. I definitely don't want to be authoritarian, and considering the subjectivity about it I highly doubt there's any realistic way to be objective about it/enforce it.