User blog comment:Master Hydraffe/ADMIN APPLICATIONS 2017 v2/@comment-8846246-20170901234701/@comment-35404949-20170903165158

It can be like thist:

PHASE #1

You can set a date of the "START" of the admin applications and a date of the "END" of the applications.

PHASE #2

Then, in a forum, will appear all the valid contenders with their speeches, each assosiated with a number. Then each user who would like to vote will comment sth like this :

1.- Support

2.-

3.-Support

{etc. } BUT each user who votes will get to only give 3 "Support"s and leave the other numbers ( like No 2 ) blank. They will HAVE to give these 3 "Support"s tho. It's not like 3 "Support"s max. ( there won't be an "Oppose" in this phase to avoid conflicts but not giving a "Support" is kinda the "Oppose" of the occasion ). The 5 with the most Supports will continue to Phase #3.

PHASE #3

The already existing admins will *PUBLICALLY* "Support" or "Oppose" for every contender that passes on this phase, also giving a "why", which means that they will also have to *publically* say why they "Support"ed or "Oppose"d. Thus, the contender with the most "Supports" will become the newest admin.

NOTES:

''1. On the contender voting forum, there would be their campaigns. It won't be just like "hey! That's me! VOTE FOR ME". No. There would be a speech campaign for each contender so that we can "eliminate" the popularity factor. Having a speech from every contender in front of you would mke it more objective to choose if you wanna "Support"  no matter who they are.''

2. To also eliminate the popularity factor once more, each user that would like to vote would HAVE to give 3 "Supports" making them: 1)Read all the speeches 2)Not "Support" just one user and leave ( which would be actually showing that popularity matters ).

3. On phase 3, if more than 1 contenders end up on the top with a tie, a voting ( in which only the current admins will take part ) will follow ( again, WITH reasoning ) and a result will come up.

''4. On phase 3, the admins that will "Support" or "oppose" will have to "Oppose" to at least 2 of the 5 contenders. That's so that we can eliminate the possibility of an admin "Support"ing everyone.''

So?