Talk:Just Dance 2016/@comment-27239525-20160314110428

First, I don't know if this has been pointed out before, and if it has, I'm sorry. So I was thinking about covers in Just Dance, and I thought about how a company that can afford such great artists like Cher, The Rolling Stones, or the Spice Girls, not be able to afford one hit wonders like Boys, Only You, Love Is All, or Macarena. I realized that maybe they don't need the original because it is not a game seller, or not a big name. Sabrina isn't really famous outside of Europe, so why would they need her name or the original song in the game, sure, it's very known around the world but not enough for them to spend a lot of money on it. Look at I Like To Move It, Who Let The Dogs Out, U Can't Touch This, Moving On Up, and Mambo No. 5; they were all their original version in their debut game, but were covered in later appearances, I think it's because they didn't need them to be their original because they were not the focus of the game in which they got a re-release, but they were the focus of their respective games, (DLC Cycle in MN5 and MOU's case), and it was important for the original versions of these songs to be recognized, and maybe that applies to other songs. I'm glad JDN is using the original versions of Moving On Up and Mambo No. 5, and I wish they would use the original versions of Who Let The Dogs Out, I Like To Move It, and U Can't Touch This. Maybe I'm wrong and those songs truly can't be afforded, and I'm not saying this applies to all covers, Britney Spears and Beyoncé can surely be game sellers so what reason other than money can be responsible for their songs being covered. I hope I explain myself well and if you have a different view, feel welcome to share it.

P.S. Sorry this is so long