Board Thread:Decisions/@comment-24264457-20160608212805/@comment-25462351-20160613082557

CAMERAwMUSTACHE wrote:

JustJaumePS4 wrote:

CAMERAwMUSTACHE wrote: Fake leaks are always a problem in the months preceding a game. However, there are sometimes some real leaks. So I propose some ways to cut down on fake leaks.
 * 1) URL must be given, not just a screenshot
 * 2) Multiple people need to see the original page
 * 3) A least one screenshot should be from a mobile device (to minimize Inspect Element leaks)
 * 4) Leaks posted by users who have a history of posting fake leaks (such as Bailarjust) should be thouroughly inspected
 * 5) Leaks should be from a Ubisoft website or Ubisoft-related social media account, or a legitimate news article or gaming store website (no publically editable sites)
 * 6) CITE!!!!!!!!

I agree, obviously but, correct me if I'm wrong but when Ubi says something isn't not a leak, it's a confirmation, because as I know, a leak is when someone from outside a company (in this case, Ubi) shares private info. So, if Ubi shares it, it's not a leak, it's an official information/confirmation. IDK if I'm right but that's what I think... Not necessarily. For example Dark Horse and Dancing Queen were leaked on the German Ubisoft site, but was later removed and denied. But that was accidentally confirmed info (even trough DQ didn't make it into the game... xD)