Board Thread:Off-Topic/@comment-24519445-20170919090254/@comment-24519445-20170920070345

Someone10000 wrote: Look, the LGBTQ+ activism is the cheapest activism. It's the easiest activism "act" for celebs to jump on to and it's also the activism category that sells the most ( in our days ).

Most of the artists you see around acting like "LGBTQ+ activists" are just selling theirselves with a better "package", having in mind that they will be applauded for that.

Generally, in my opinion, LGBTQ+ activism sounds really immature. There are way bigger problems in humanity and when it comes to this one, you just have to let go of the individuals not willing to "evolve". Like, it's a problem that will get eliminated as years pass by. I mean, ( for example ) it's hard for my gramps to understand a different sexual orientation and that's ok. It's how they grew up and how they know the world, I understand that. On the contrary, my generation are way way opener in these stuff. Imagine how the next generation will face it - very positively. BUT, even at these times, there will always be an exception of some individuals that will not accept it, but that's the way it works. It's just as bad as insulting a more chubby person or insulting someone for their interests.

''It's pointless to demand sth to be accepted by all. - S10K.'' Are you saying that celebrities only endorse LGBTQ+ rights for exposure? Sweetie, no. Something I also have a problem with is that you're pretty much saying that LGBTQ+ rights are stupid and irrelevant and that we should do nothing about this. Like, what on Earth? People literally dedicate their career to the LGBT (Lady Gaga, RuPaul etc), so what are you even talking about?