Board Thread:Decisions/@comment-24264457-20160608212805/@comment-24264457-20160612205958

JustJaumePS4 wrote: CAMERAwMUSTACHE wrote: Fake leaks are always a problem in the months preceding a game. However, there are sometimes some real leaks. So I propose some ways to cut down on fake leaks.
 * 1) URL must be given, not just a screenshot
 * 2) Multiple people need to see the original page
 * 3) A least one screenshot should be from a mobile device (to minimize Inspect Element leaks)
 * 4) Leaks posted by users who have a history of posting fake leaks (such as Bailarjust) should be thouroughly inspected
 * 5) Leaks should be from a Ubisoft website or Ubisoft-related social media account, or a legitimate news article or gaming store website (no publically editable sites)
 * 6) CITE!!!!!!!!

I agree, obviously but, correct me if I'm wrong but when Ubi says something isn't not a leak, it's a confirmation, because as I know, a leak is when someone from outside a company (in this case, Ubi) shares private info. So, if Ubi shares it, it's not a leak, it's an official information/confirmation. IDK if I'm right but that's what I think... Not necessarily. For example Dark Horse and Dancing Queen were leaked on the German Ubisoft site, but was later removed and denied.