Board Thread:Decisions/@comment-1465604-20170913111119/@comment-30455787-20170919203949

FallenAngelII wrote:

HopelessFountainMonkey wrote:

FallenAngelII wrote: I went through all of the posts and I counted the following:

5 Supports: FallenAngelII, Pearl Louise, SeriousBlackJD, Bunnylove14, Inani2, ParrotEyes (they're not quoting anyone, just accidentally placed their reply in a quote for some reason)

4 Opposes: Jackboog21, TheChibiKing, CAMERAwMUSTACHE, Milo Casteblanco, Marwikia

3 Invalid Votes: JDLOVER2957 (Did not give a reason, only quoted someone else. Unless that counts?), HopelessFountainMonkey (No reason given, also only quoted someone else), DynamoDerp11 (Playlist argument, invalid)

[And some less than valid arguments, but that's for another discussion. This is about tallying the votes]

By majority vote, the motion carries. By logic alone, the motion should carry. At the very least, this is information Ubisoft has retracted and as such it is unreliable. Master Hydraffe, do I have permission to delete the two entries? We can even add them in the trivia section as songs that were potentially leaked, but whose fate is still very much in the air, as long as they're gone from the main track list. I quoted them bc I agreed with them. By the rules, though, that's not enough. You have to actually say "I agree with this" or something. Unless I've misinterpreted how polls like this have worked in the past. But isnt saying "support what [...] says" good because its just easier to quote someone without making a long-a** paragraph about how its right and your wrong.