Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-5392675-20160227020043/@comment-5392675-20160227021945

Minifigureman11 wrote: It's just pointing out that something that should be censored isn't. Such as the IKAG and CFTS cherry incident. The use in the latter is more inappropriate than the former. Yet CFTS wasn't censored and IKAG was. They are valid trivia points. They shouldn't be linked to each other in that way. Nothing is "more inappropriate" that the other when we're trying to be objective. None of us think the exact way that the censorers at Ubisoft/PEGI/whatever do, and we have no idea what their ideology is. To "think" for them would be grossly unfair.