Talk:Just Dance 2017/@comment-4565097-20161125110403/@comment-1465604-20161126000659

@JScorpioN96: Anbd my reply to Marko was 4 sentences and 4 rows long. It wasn't an "essay". It was relatively short.

Why don't I reply to every single "THIS NEEDS TO BE IN THE GAME POST"? Because most of them are clearly in jest. Like, who would seriously think the Pokémon Go Song would stand a chance of making the series? And people have often already responded with what I was going to respond with by the time I see them, anyway.

No one had yet responded by the time I saw Marko's post. Also, "This KPOP song should totally in the game! We need more KPOP! KPOP KPOP KPOP!!!!!" posts crop up all the time on this Wikia. I just felt like it was time why I said why I don't think we're likely to get any KPOP songs besides Psy's in the near future. This was literally the first time I'd brought up this argument (previously it was simply about how unlikely it'd be for the female dance crew to be "I AM THE BEST").

Can any of us really know how Ubisoft selects their songs? No. We're not Ubisoft. It's why I use the following expressions:
 * "Psy is likely the only Korean musician who'll ever be seen on a main series Just Dance game because of his international success"
 * "Would you, as a company like Ubisoft, take a look at this chart 'success' and go 'Hey, I wanna throw oodles of cash at either of these bands to license their songs for worldwide distribution in our games'?"
 * "Say you're Ubisoft..."

Well, at least I started out using those qualifiers. They dropped off a bit as the discussion progressed, but I made it clear early on that I make no claims to know the secret behind Ubisoft's song choices. I shouldn't have to qualify each and every post in the same discussion afterwards just to make sure people haven't forgotten about my earlier qualifiers.